One Frame

Photographer (I)

The photographer found the corner table by habit. The corner was where the stories tended to assemble themselves. Two walls, one window, the door visible without turning the head. A working position. They set the bag down without taking the camera out and ordered a long black from the woman at the counter, who knew them well enough not to ask how. The cup arrived heavy and warm and they wrapped both hands around it and looked, finally, at the room.

It was a Tuesday in May, mid-afternoon, the light already starting its slow lean toward gold. Surry Hills was quiet the way it only ever was on a weekday between lunch and peak commute hour. Three tables occupied. Two men further back, quiet, possibly father and son. A woman in the far corner typing something on her tablet. A man at the table directly opposite, alone, a book in hand and an espresso cup on the table.

The photographer noticed him without thinking. Mid forties, lean, the kind of stubble that came from forgetting rather than choosing. The angle of the head was good. The light from the window was raking across the side of the face and the hand holding the page. The book was a paperback, bent open well past halfway, the spine gone soft, the kind of book someone had been carrying for weeks. His coffee was finished. He had been there a while and did not seem to be planning to leave.

The photographer noted the geometry and let their eye move on.

Then the door opened.

She came in already half out of her jacket, the kind of arrival that suggested she had walked further than she had planned. She nodded at the woman behind the counter and said something the photographer couldn't hear and laughed once, low. While she waited she pushed her hair off her face with the back of her wrist, a gesture that did not check itself in any reflective surface. She took her coffee and a small plate with something on it and turned to look for a table.

She chose the table nearest the window. A bench on one side, a chair on the other. She took the bench. Two tables from the man with the book.

The photographer noted the order of operations. Her eye had gone to the light first. The people in the room had not entered the decision.

For the next several minutes the photographer drank their coffee and read the menu they already knew by heart and did the soft watching they always did. The woman by the window had taken out a notebook and was writing in it, slowly. The man with the book had not looked up. The two men further back had stopped talking and were now both looking at their phones. The woman with the tablet had ordered another coffee. The barista had switched the music to something quieter without anyone asking.

The photographer waited for the room to stop being interesting.

It didn't.

Something had changed and they couldn't immediately identify what. They put the cup down and looked again. The man with the book was still reading. The woman by the window was still writing. The light through the window had moved slightly along the back wall, the slab of warm gold inching across the wall. None of that explained the feeling.

Another minute and they saw it.

The man with the book had turned a page. The woman by the window had paused her writing. Both of them had done it at the same moment, and neither had looked up. The man took a small breath and went back to reading. The woman put her pen down, and reached for her coffee without looking at it.

The photographer felt a small click in the chest that meant a frame had begun to assemble itself. Not yet a photo. Just the conditions for one.

Their camera stayed in the bag. It was too early. The frame, if it was going to exist, would tell them when.

They ordered a second coffee and settled deeper into the chair. The light moved another inch along the wall. Outside, an autumn leaf came loose from somewhere above the window and fell past the glass in a slow diagonal. Neither the man nor the woman saw it.

The photographer saw it, and noted the time.

It was 2:47 PM.

  

Him

He had not planned to be there.

He had planned to be at the desk in the back room of the house, working on a circuit board that had been sitting half-populated for three weeks, waiting for him to find an uninterrupted afternoon. The afternoon had been booked. The components were laid out. The soldering iron was within arm's reach.

At eleven that morning he had stood in the doorway of the back room with his coffee and had not gone in.

He had looked at the bench, at the board, at the tools arranged the way he had left them, and he had felt, without drama, that he did not want to do it today. The work would be there tomorrow. The work was always there tomorrow. That was both the gift and the cost of doing it.

He had put the coffee down on the kitchen bench and gone to the bedroom and changed out of the soft trousers he wore at home and into dark jeans and a long-sleeved grey top. He had not shaved. He had pulled on socks and the leather boots he used for walking rather than riding. He had taken the small canvas bag with the book in it. He had not told anyone he was leaving because there was no one in the house to tell.

He had taken the train rather than the bike.

He could not have explained that decision either. The bike was outside, fuelled, ready. The train took longer. The train involved walking to the station and waiting and sitting next to other people and walking again at the other end. None of which was efficient. All of which he had chosen.

By the time he sat down at the table in the café in Surry Hills it was just past two and he had been off-script for three hours. He noticed this without alarm. He had been off-script for entire weekends before and the world had not ended. He ordered an espresso because that was what this place did well and he opened the book at the page he had marked the night before.

The book was Rebecca Solnit. A Field Guide to Getting Lost. He had bought it on a whim a few months ago and was reading it in small pieces, absorbing the chapters, the way he sometimes read things that he suspected of being important to him.

He read for some time without noticing the room.

Then the door opened and the room changed.

He did not look up. He felt it the way you feel a draft in a closed building — something had changed at the air-pressure level and his body had registered it before his attention had. He kept his eyes on the page, held still, and let whoever it was do whatever they were doing. Somebody ordered something. Somebody laughed. Somebody walked across the wooden floor in shoes that were not heels, not boots, something in between. The shoes stopped and he heard the soft movement of a person sliding in behind a table, the bench seat.

He turned the page.

He registered, distantly, that he had not actually read the last paragraph. He went back and read it properly. Solnit was writing about the colour blue and how it lived only at distance. The blue of mountains. The blue of the far horizon. The blue you could never reach because reaching it dissolved it. He read the paragraph twice and the second time he understood it and the third time he understood it in a way he had not expected to.

He looked up.

He did it slowly, the way he did everything in public when he did not want to draw attention. He looked toward the window first, then let his gaze drift back across the room, his eyes passed the table two over and registered the presence at it.

A woman, mid-thirties, dark hair, writing in a notebook. Coffee cup in one hand, pen down on the page, looking out the window at something he could not see from his angle. Her caught the light from the window along the line of her cheekbone and her jaw. She was not posing. She was not even aware of the light. She was looking at whatever was outside and her hand had stopped moving on the page mid-word.

He looked away again before she felt it.

He finished the espresso, set the cup down, and felt his pulse — slightly faster than it had been. Not arousal. Not yet anything as defined as that. Just the small body-level acknowledgement that a person who was operating in his register had walked into the room.

He had felt this before, occasionally, over the years. It was always specific. It was never about beauty in the conventional sense, although sometimes the person was beautiful. It was about something harder to name — a quality of unselfconsciousness, a way of being in a space without performing the being. He could go years without feeling it. He had learned not to make anything of it when he did. It was data, not direction.

He went back to the book.

He read for several more minutes and turned another page and did not look up again. The woman by the window was not his to look at. Whatever he had registered was his to register, privately, and to leave alone. The work of the afternoon, if there was any, was simply to be in the room and to read the book and to drink another coffee and to go home before dark. That was sufficient.

He finished the chapter.

He reached for the cup and remembered it was empty. He caught the eye of the woman behind the counter and lifted the cup an inch. She nodded.

While he was waiting he let his eyes move across the room again, naturally this time, and the woman by the window was looking at him.

Not staring. Not staged. She had been looking around the room the way he had been looking around the room and her gaze had landed on him at the moment his had landed on her and neither of them moved their eyes for a beat longer than was strictly required.

She lifted her coffee cup.

It was the smallest gesture. A quarter of an inch. Not a salute, not a toast, just an acknowledgement. I see you. I see you seeing me. We both know what this is.

He lifted his empty cup back, the same quarter inch, and felt himself smile, and the smile was not a reaction to her smile, which had also appeared, also without reaction. Both smiles had simply arrived, at the same time, on two separate faces, for reasons that belonged to neither of them.

She went back to her notebook.

He went back to his book.

The next coffee arrived. He thanked the barista. He read another page. He did not look up.

Something in the room had changed. This time he knew what it was. He did not need to look up again to confirm it. They had recognised each other. That was enough.

He read on.

  

Her

She was going to the gallery.

That was what she told herself at breakfast, sitting at the small table by the window of the apartment, eating toast she had not particularly wanted. There was an exhibition at the AGNSW she had been meaning to see for three weeks. It would close in five days. Today was the day. She had said this aloud to the empty kitchen and the kitchen had not argued.

By the time she was on the train she had dropped the gallery from the plan.

She did not decide this. She simply found herself, somewhere around Redfern, knowing that she would not get off at St James. The train continued. She continued with it. She got off at Central and walked east instead of north and did not interrogate the choice. She had a notebook in her bag and a pen that worked and a coffee card with three stamps left and that was a full afternoon's equipment as far as she was concerned.

She walked through Surry Hills slowly. The streets were quieter than she had expected. The autumn light was doing the thing it did in Sydney in May, the soft warm angle that made every brick wall look like it had been painted by someone careful. She walked past two cafés on the way to the one she was going to. The first two had been too busy. The third had few people inside and a chalkboard out the front and a door propped open with a cast iron weight, and the smell coming out of it was good.

Inside, she ordered a flat white and a small piece of cake she did not need, paid, turned, and chose the table by the window because the light was good there.

She sat down, took the notebook out, opened it to the page she had been working on, and did not start writing immediately. She drank a third of the coffee first. Then she looked out the window for a while at the small triangle of sky visible above the building opposite. Then she picked up the pen.

She was writing about a conversation she had not yet had.

The notebook contained a long, slow drafting of something she would eventually need to say to a person she had known for many years. The drafting had been going on for months. She did not know yet whether the conversation would actually happen or whether the drafting was the conversation, conducted with herself, in lieu of the real one. Both were possible. She had decided not to force the question.

She wrote two paragraphs and then stopped.

She did not stop because she had run out of things to say. She stopped because she had, for the second time in the last few minutes, noted that something in the room was different from how it had been when she came in. She put the pen down and reached for her coffee without looking at it and held the cup in both hands and let her eyes lift, slowly, to the window, and then past it, into the reflective surface of the glass where the room appeared in soft transparency over the street outside.

In the reflection she could see the room around her.

There was a man, two tables over, reading a book. Had he been there when she came in? She had not registered him then. She registered him now. He was reading slowly. He looked like he was the kind of reader who read deliberately. She could tell from the way his eyes moved and the way his hand did not hover near the page corner the way a fast reader's would. He was reading as if the book were a place he was walking through, not a thing he was finishing.

He had a touch of grey hair, slightly long at the front, and a few days of stubble, and he was wearing dark clothing that was not making any particular statement. He was holding the book the way people held books they had been reading for a while — the spine gone soft, the pages curled at the edges, the cover slightly bent.

She looked at him for as long as the reflection allowed without turning her head. Maybe ten seconds. Then she went back to her notebook.

She wrote one more sentence and stopped again.

She had not actually written the sentence. She had drawn a small mark on the page and then her hand had stopped. She put the pen down properly this time and sat back and did the thing she had learned to do, over the years, when something was happening that her body had felt before her mind had caught up. She breathed slowly. She let the breath go out further than the breath in. She waited.

Then she turned her head.

Not toward him. Toward the room generally. She let her gaze move across the space the way it would move if she were looking for the bathroom or the counter or the chalkboard, naturally, without intent. Her gaze passed the two men at the back. It passed the woman with the tablet in the far corner whom she had not noticed before. It passed the person in the corner with the long black, sitting quietly. It came back across the room toward the window, and as it passed the table where the man with the book was sitting, he was looking at her.

He was not staring. He had been looking around the room the way she had been looking around the room. Their gazes had landed on each other in the same moment, neither of them having engineered it.

She did not look away.

Then she did the small thing. She lifted her coffee cup. A quarter inch.

He lifted his cup back.

She watched his face for the half-second it took the smile to arrive there. He was smiling at the moment, the way a person smiles when something has gone unexpectedly right. She felt her own face doing the same thing and understood, while it was happening, that they were both smiling at the same thing.

She held the smile for one more beat than she needed to. So did he. Then both of them went back to what they had been doing, which in her case was a sentence she could no longer remember and in his case was a book she suspected he was no longer reading.

She picked up her pen.

She did not write anything for a while. She sat with the pen above the page and did not write. She was aware of him without looking at him. She could feel that he had not looked at her again. He was doing exactly what she was doing — sitting with what had happened, not building on it, not trying to extend it, just letting it be true in the room with both of them.

After several minutes she wrote one line in the notebook.

She wrote it small, near the bottom of the page, in a handwriting slightly tighter than her usual.

 

The blue of mountains, she wrote.

 

She had no idea where the phrase had come from. It had simply arrived. She underlined it once and went back to the conversation she had been drafting before, and found that the next paragraph wrote itself easily, more easily than anything had in weeks.

She did not look at him again for a long time.

But she was aware, the way one is aware of a window left open in another room, that he was there, that he had recognised her, that she had recognised him, and that the room they were both in had changed, irreversibly, in a way that neither of them was going to do anything about.

She wrote on.

The light moved another inch along the back wall.

 

The Photographer (II)

The photographer had been watching the room for thirty-eight minutes when the gap closed.

They almost missed it. They had let their attention drift, briefly, to the woman with the tablet in the far corner, who had stood up and was putting on a coat with the careful slowness of someone who did not want to leave but had run out of reasons to stay. The photographer had followed her with their eyes to the door and watched her pause at the threshold and look back once at the room and then go.

When they brought their gaze back to the centre of the café the man with the book was standing.

He was not standing in the way someone stands to leave. He had not picked up his bag. The book was on the table, face-down, holding his place. He was walking toward the counter, but on a path that took him past the woman with the notebook. He was carrying his empty cup.

The photographer registered the trajectory and felt the small click in the chest again.

He did not stop at her table. He passed it with maybe a metre of clearance and continued to the counter and put the cup down and ordered another coffee and waited. The photographer watched the back of him. The shoulders were relaxed. The hands were loose at his sides. He was not performing the walk. He had not stopped at her table.

She had not looked up when he passed.

The photographer noted that too. She had registered him. They could see it in the small stillness of her hand on the page, the half-second pause that her writing had taken as he walked by. But she had not looked. She was waiting, the photographer thought, the way someone waits for weather to decide what it's doing before they commit to going outside.

The new coffee arrived. He picked it up. He turned.

He took two steps toward his own table and then stopped, holding the coffee, and stood for a moment in the middle of the floor as if he had forgotten something. The photographer watched him do this and understood that he had not forgotten anything. He was deciding.

It took perhaps four seconds.

Then he changed direction and walked, without hurry, to the table where the woman was sitting, and stopped beside it, standing at a polite distance with the coffee in his hand. He said something. The photographer could not hear it. It was short. Two sentences, maybe three. His face was open but neutral, the face of someone making a small offering that the other person was free to refuse without cost.

She looked up.

She did not look surprised. She looked at him for a beat that was longer than required and then she said something back, also short, and gestured, very small, at the chair on the other side of the table. Her free hand found the notebook and folded it closed.

He retrieved his bag and book. He sat down, placing the bag on the floor, the book on the table near her notebook, face-down, holding its place.

The photographer let out a breath they had not known they were holding.

Now the room had two centres of gravity. The man and the woman at her table by the window, with the slab of afternoon light still moving slowly down the wall behind them. The photographer in the corner, watching them.

No one else had noticed. The two men at the back were on their phones. The barista had glanced up when the man changed direction and had glanced down again without comment.

The photographer reached, finally, for the bag.

They did not take the camera out. They unzipped the bag halfway and left it. They wanted the camera available but not present. The frame, if it became a frame, would announce itself. They had been doing this long enough to know that the worst thing a photographer could do at this stage was lift the camera. Lifting the camera changed the room. The camera had to stay in the bag until the room had finished doing whatever it was doing.

The photographer ordered a third coffee they did not want and settled in to watch.

The conversation at the table was quiet. The photographer could not hear words at this distance, only the rhythm. It was a slow rhythm. Long pauses. Neither person filling silence. The man had set the coffee down in front of him and had not picked it up again for several minutes. The woman had closed her notebook but had not put it away. It sat on the table between them, not as a barrier but as something both of them could look at if a moment got difficult. Neither of them had needed to look at it yet.

After perhaps ten minutes the woman laughed.

It was a low laugh, brief, and the photographer saw the man's face shift in response — not into a returning laugh but into the small softening that happens when someone realises the person they are talking to is funnier than they had expected. He said something and she laughed again, and this time he laughed too. The laughs overlapped briefly and stopped.

The photographer noticed her shift, slightly, in her bench. A quarter inch closer to the table. Her elbow now resting on the table where it had not been before. Her body angled, by a few degrees, toward him.

He had done his own version of the same thing. His chair had not moved but his body had. He was leaning forward an inch. His hands were nearer to her hands than they had been when he sat down. Neither of them was touching. Neither of them was preparing to touch. The space between their hands had simply contracted, by the small physics of two bodies finding their level on a flat surface.

The conversation went on. The light moved further down the wall. At some point the man ordered a glass of water, the woman ordered another coffee, and the barista brought both things over. The conversation paused while she set them down and resumed the moment she walked away. The photographer noted the resumption. The bodies had picked up exactly where they had left off. People who did that had been talking about something that mattered to them.

After what the photographer estimated was forty minutes from the moment he had sat down — though it might have been less, the light made time hard to read in a café — the woman leaned, briefly, toward him.

She said something close to his ear, three or four words, and then sat back. He nodded. The nod was slow. He was thinking about what she had said.

When she sat back, she did not sit back as far as before. The new resting position was several inches closer to him than the old one. Her knee, beneath the table, was now almost touching his. Her tan ankle boot was angled slightly toward his brown one, neither of them quite resting on the other.

The photographer reached into the bag and took the camera out.

They did it slowly and they did it under the table, on their lap, where the movement would not register to anyone in the room. They turned the camera on. They checked the battery. They set the aperture wide and the shutter slow enough to hold the available light and they left the camera on their lap, ready, and folded their hands over it.

They were not going to lift it yet.

They were going to wait until the bodies had settled fully into whatever they were settling into, and then they were going to walk over, and they were going to ask, and they were going to find out whether the two people at the table by the window would say yes.

The light on the back wall was almost in the right position. Outside, the autumn afternoon had perhaps another forty minutes of usable light in it. The photographer estimated they had ten before the frame would be fully assembled and they would need to act.

They sat with the camera in their lap and they watched.

Across the room, at the table by the window, the man and the woman were now sitting close enough that an observer who did not know they had met an hour ago would have assumed they had known each other for years.

The photographer was the only observer.

They waited.

  

The Photo

The photographer waited until the woman picked up her coffee.

It was the first time she had picked it up in twenty minutes. She had been holding the cup near the start of the conversation. She had set it down at some point and had not returned to it. When her hand finally went back to the cup it was a small signal that the conversation had reached a natural place to pause. Not an ending. A breath.

The photographer stood up.

They left the camera on the chair, hidden by the bag, and walked across the café without it. This was deliberate. A photographer approaching a table with a camera in hand was a transaction. A person approaching a table with empty hands was a person. The conversation could be had on human terms first, and the camera could be introduced, if it was going to be introduced, only after.

They stopped a polite distance from the table. Both of them looked up.

"I'm sorry to interrupt," the photographer said.

The man set his glass down. The woman did not put her cup back on the saucer; she held it at chest height, both hands, watching.

"I'm a photographer," they said. "I've been sitting in the corner for the last hour or so, and the light is doing something on this wall right now that won't last more than a few minutes. I wondered if you'd let me take a single frame of the two of you, where you're sitting. One frame. It would mean a lot to me if you said yes, and I'll understand completely if you say no."

There was a pause.

The man and the woman did not look at each other. The photographer registered that they did not look at each other and understood why. Looking at each other would have made the decision a couple's decision, which it was not. They were not a couple. They had met an hour ago. They each had to decide for themselves, separately, and they were giving each other the space to do that without coordinating.

The man spoke first.

"Which wall," he said. A request for specifics.

The photographer gestured behind them. "The wall behind you. The light is moving down. If we did it now you'd be against it, both of you where you're sitting, and the light would be just behind your shoulders. Maybe two minutes of usable light. I'd take one frame and that's it."

The man considered this. He did not look at the wall. He had already seen the wall when he sat down.

"I'm fine with that," he said.

The woman beside him, said, "I don't mind."

"Thank you," the photographer said. "I'll be quick."

They walked back to their corner, picked up the camera, checked the settings again, and walked back. They did not lift the camera as they approached. They came to the table and stopped at the same polite distance and then, only then, raised the camera to their eye.

Through the viewfinder the frame assembled itself.

The man, without anyone asking, had moved. He had stepped around the small table and was now sitting on the bench beside her. She had shifted along the bench so that her shoulder was touching his shoulder, and she had let her temple come to rest against the side of his head, just above his ear, with the soft natural weight of someone who has been sitting that way for years. Her hand had found his forearm and had settled there, fingers relaxed. His hands were on his thighs, palms down. His face was open, calm, looking directly at the camera. Hers was the same.

Neither was smiling.

The photographer had been ready for them to smile. Most people smiled when a camera was raised. These two did not. They held the camera's gaze with the same unhurried steadiness they had held each other's an hour earlier across two tables.

The light was on the wall behind them. It had moved down to the level of their shoulders and was just catching the top of the woman's hair, warming a few strands against the off-white. Below the table, visible at the edge of the frame, the photographer could see the man's well-worn brown boots planted on the floorboards and the woman's tan ankle boots crossed at the ankle, one tucked slightly behind the other.

The frame was complete.

The photographer took it.

One shutter. The smallest mechanical sound, snick. Then a half-second pause, during which they could have wound on the film and taken a second frame and chose not to, and then they lowered the camera.

"Thank you," they said again.

The man inclined his head a fraction. The woman smiled, once, briefly, with her eyes more than her mouth. Neither of them moved away from the other. The pose did not collapse the moment the camera came down. They stayed as they were for another beat, and another, and then, slowly, the woman lifted her temple from his head and the hand on his forearm relaxed and slid back into her own lap, and the man took a slow breath and looked at the table in front of him.

The photographer walked back to their corner.

They sat down. They put the camera in the bag. The frame would either be there or it would not.

They ordered a glass of water from the woman behind the counter, who brought it over without comment. The photographer drank half of it and sat with the camera bag at their feet and watched the rest of the room come slowly back into focus.

At the bench by the window the conversation had resumed.

He had not gone back to the chair. The photographer noted this from the corner. The two of them were still on the bench, her temple no longer against his head, but their shoulders still touching, his hand on the bench between them, hers loose in her lap. The closeness had not retracted. It had settled, an inch or two closer than it had been before the photo, and this was the position that would hold.

That was the small grace of the photo. It had given them an excuse to do what they had been moving toward all afternoon, and once done, the doing did not need to be undone.

The woman had reopened her notebook and had her pen in her hand again, but she was not writing. She was using the pen as something to gesture with — pointing, occasionally, at the page. The man was talking. The photographer could not hear what he was saying but could see, from the way his hands had come up off the bench and were now describing some shape in the air between them, that he was telling her about something he cared about.

She was listening.

The photographer understood that the photo had not been the climax of the afternoon for the two people at the table. It had been an interruption they had agreed to and then absorbed. The afternoon's actual climax, whatever it was, was still happening, and was none of the photographer's business.

They finished the water. They walked to the counter and paid for everything they had drunk, and paid for the man's next coffee and the woman's next coffee without saying which table the extra money was for. The woman behind the counter nodded and did not say anything about it.

The photographer went back to the corner, picked up the bag, and walked to the door.

At the door they turned, briefly, and looked at the table by the window one more time.

The man and the woman had not noticed them go. The man was still talking. The woman was still listening. The autumn light on the back wall had moved on and was now just a soft warm wash on the upper third of the wall, fading by the minute.

The photographer pushed the door open and stepped out into the street.

The door swung slowly closed behind them, and the small bell rang once above the frame.

 

The Contact Sheet

The photographer's apartment was on the second floor of a building in Newtown that had not been renovated since the eighties. Wooden floors, a galley kitchen, a single window in the living room that faced west. By the time they got home it was nearly six and the last of the light was gone.

They put the camera bag down on the kitchen bench. They made tea. They drank half of it standing at the bench, looking at nothing in particular, letting the day come down off them slowly the way it always needed to after a day out walking the streets of Sydney.

When the tea was cold they sat down and took the camera from the bag. Frames remained. The camera went back in. The bag went on the shelf.

The roll finished a week later on another walk in the city. They sent it for processing the following Monday. They picked up the lab envelope two weeks after that.

They made tea. They sat down at the kitchen bench with the envelope and opened it.

The contact sheet first. They laid it flat on the bench and put the loupe over the corner. They scanned down the rows of frames, slowly, until they found the café.

The frame was there.

The geometry of two figures on a bench against a pale wall and the small square of warm light behind them.

Even at contact-sheet size, through the loupe, it was sharp where it needed to be sharp and soft where it needed to be soft. The light on the wall behind them had landed exactly where the photographer had wanted it to land. The man was looking at the camera with the calm open expression he had been wearing all afternoon. The woman's temple was against his head. Her hand was on his forearm. Neither was smiling. Both pairs of boots were visible at the bottom of the frame, his planted, hers crossed.

The photographer looked at it for a long time.

"They were looking, partly, at the technical things — the focus, the exposure, the colour balance — and partly at the thing the technical things were carrying. The thing the technical things were carrying was the part they could not have planned for and could not take credit for.

After some minutes they labelled the contact sheet, in pencil, on the small line at the top: café, autumn, two.

The negatives and contact sheet went into the archive box on the shelf.

They sat for a while at the kitchen bench and thought about the two people at the table. They thought about the woman behind the counter who had brought the coffees over. They thought about the small bell on the café door. They thought about whether they would go back to that café tomorrow or in a week or never, and decided, without effort, that it did not matter. The café was not the point.

They had not scanned the frame for editing. The frame was not ready to be worked on. It might never be. Some frames sat in the archive for years before the photographer knew what to do with them. Some never came out at all. This one, they suspected, would be one of the second kind.

Two people who had met once, in a café in Surry Hills, on a Tuesday afternoon in autumn, sat against a pale wall in the warm slab of light, and a stranger had marked it with one shutter, and saved it under a name that no one else would ever look for. The photo had been given, not taken. It belonged to the photographer now. The conversation the two had been having continued, somewhere, without them.

The photographer turned off the kitchen light and went to bed.

The Grey Harbour

Before I was a port, I was a promise. A curve of coast that meant shelter. The whales knew me then - knew my depths and shallows, my tides and temperatures. They'd come to scrape themselves clean against my stones, roll in my shallows until the water went dark with what they needed to shed. Gray whales, humpbacks, even the great blues would visit, following maps written in currents and instinct, finding this place where the sea floor was just right for rubbing away what irritated.

I remember when the first pylon was driven into my sand. Men who thought they were creating something new, not understanding they were adding wooden bones to a body that already knew how to hold visiting giants. Before the schedules and the sirens, before humans decided water was just distance to be conquered.

At first, the whales still came. They'd scratch their great sides against my new pilings alongside my old stones. They'd sing down there in the dark water, and I'd feel it through both foundations - the ancient rock and the fresh wood. Wooden bones. Salt bones. Patient bones. All learning the same song.

That was when I was just a few posts, a suggestion of human shelter built over whale wisdom. They taught me my purpose hadn't changed - to be a place of rest, of tending. Simple exchange. They got clean. I got visitors who asked for nothing but presence.

Now I get cargo ships with captains who count only minutes and tonnage. They roar in at all hours, demanding immediate berth, shouting about deadlines, insurance, liability. As if I could create more space. As if storms were personal insults. As if infrastructure doesn't fatigue.

But between them, in the quiet hours, the softer things remain. The mussels still filter silence through my lower reaches. Small fish dart between my shadows. Kelp knows how to bend without breaking, teaches me something about survival I should have learned sooner.

The soft humans come too. Dawn visitors who watch water change colour. Who tie their small boats with care, not force. Who understand that ports need silence like lungs need exhale.

___

The storm came on a Tuesday. Nothing special about it - I've weathered thousands. But this captain was different in his sameness. Red-faced, diesel-drunk, screaming about his schedule as if wind cared about cargo manifests. Demanding priority berth while three other vessels rode out the weather with dignity.

"You don't understand," he kept saying. "This delay will cost everything."

I wanted to tell him: I am older than your grandfather's grandfather. I have held ships through hurricanes that erased entire coastlines. I understand cost. I understand everything except why humans create storms where none exist.

But ports don't speak. We only hold.

That night, in the narrow hour between midnight and morning, I felt something else. Vibrations through deep water. A frequency I hadn't felt in twenty years.

Whale song.

Not the joy I remembered. This was mourning. Low and long, carrying grief I couldn't fathom. The last of its pod, maybe. Or carrying losses too vast for human understanding. The song rose through my pilings, travelled through wood that remembered when it was trees, when it stood on mountains, when it knew different songs.

The whale came closer than they ever do now. Close enough that I felt its scars through the water's movement. This wasn't the smooth giant of my memory. This was a survivor, barnacled and worn like me.

And then, through the mourning song, came something impossible. A question, vibrating through my deepest supports:

"What do you need?"

—-

I didn't know how to answer. I was built to provide, not to need. For three centuries, I've been asked for shelter, for safety, for speed. But need? What does a port need?

The whale kept singing, patient. Each night of that long storm, the same question. It would surface to breathe - that great gasp that sounds like the earth sighing - then dive again, singing into my foundations.

The demanding captain raged above. The whale sang below. Between them, I began to crack. Not the structural failing kind - the opening kind. The kind that lets light into dark places.

On the third night, I found an answer. Or it found me.

"I need to not be everything to everyone. I need storms to mean rest, not more crisis. I need to remember why I chose to be here - for beauty, for connection, not just function."

The whale's song shifted. Still mournful, but now carrying something else. Recognition, maybe. Or the wisdom that comes from swimming alone through dark water.

"Then let some ships wreck themselves," the whale sang. "It's not your job to save those who won't navigate carefully. Save your strength for those who understand that shelter is a gift, not a right."

—-

The storm passed, as storms do. The angry captain left, cursing my inadequacy. The whale disappeared into deeper water. But something had changed.

I began to notice things.

The winch on pier seven - the Port Authority should have oiled it months ago, but someone else had. Fresh rope appeared on the cleats they'd condemned but never replaced. Someone had reinforced the corner piling that only I knew was starting to rot - the inspectors who charged for quarterly reports never went that deep.

The managers extracted fees, the owners extracted profits, but maintenance? That ate into margins. So the soft captains did it instead, quietly fixing what the powerful ignored.

There were shells on my posts. Small offerings from children who don't see infrastructure as merely functional. They see altars. Canvas. Something worthy of decoration. I'd been receiving offerings I couldn't recognize as love.

The fisherman who always tied up at pier three - he'd been checking my moorings every morning. Not for his safety. For mine. Tightening what loosened, noting what needed attention, fixing without announcement.

The woman who sits at my edge each dawn, feet in water - I'd thought she came for solitude. But she's been humming. The same frequency as whale song. She knows something. Maybe she's always known. Maybe her humming is what called the whale back. Maybe she's been singing to me all along, waiting for me to get quiet enough to hear.

—-

I'd been so deafened by the demanding captains, I stopped hearing the quiet ones who were trying to give back. The ones who understood that even the strongest structures need maintenance. That giving can flow both ways. That harbours need harbouring too.

Not all the traffic had been extraction. Some captains had left me stronger. But I'd been too exhausted by the takers to receive from the givers.

Now, in morning mist, I watch differently. The small boat that always ties up gently - that's intention, not accident. The child arranging shells in patterns - that's prayer, not play. The woman humming whale song - that's healing, not habit.

—-

This morning, low tide, the woman walked my entire length. At each piling, she paused. Touched the wood. At my oldest post, the first one, whale-scarred and beautiful, she pressed both palms flat against it and whispered something I couldn't hear over the gulls.

But I felt it. The same vibration as whale song. The same question:

"What do you need?"

This time, I knew the answer. But more important, I found myself wondering:

How many soft captains had I missed while listening to the loud ones? How many shells arranged as prayers? How many songs hummed at frequencies I was too exhausted to hear?

The tide turns. It always does. And in the turning, I'm learning to notice what was always there - the quiet mending, the patient tending, the love that doesn't announce itself but simply fixes what's broken and moves on.

When the men go, the whales will return. If any are left.

But maybe they never really left. Maybe they just transformed. Became the soft captains, the dawn hummers, the shell-givers. Maybe care just changed shape, waiting for me to get quiet enough to recognize it.

End

For Nerina and our family,
soft captains all.

The Patchwork Tightens: Australian E-Mobility and Lithium-Ion Battery Regulations as of May 2026

For most of the past decade, Australian regulation of e-bikes, e-scooters and the lithium-ion batteries that power them has been a state-by-state patchwork. A 500 W e-bike bought legally in Sydney was an unregistered motor vehicle the moment it crossed into Victoria. An e-scooter was footpath-legal in Brisbane and Hobart but illegal in Sydney and Darwin. A trade in cheap, uncertified batteries — many destined for delivery riders’ converted bikes — fed a steady stream of fires that fire services across the country had been documenting in increasing numbers.

That patchwork is now being rewoven, fast. Two events in late 2025 set the new direction: the Commonwealth’s reinstatement of EN 15194 as the national e-bike import standard, and NSW’s decision to fold its anomalous 500 W allowance back to 250 W. Around those federal-state pivots, every jurisdiction has either tightened its own rules or has draft legislation in the pipeline. This article summarises where each state and territory now sits, across three regulatory dimensions: who can sell what, who can ride where, and what can come on public transport.

-----

The Federal Pivot: EN 15194 Reinstated

For years there was no enforceable national reference standard for what constituted a legal e-bike in Australia. EN 15194 had been adopted in 2014, then quietly abandoned in subsequent years, leaving importers free to bring in devices that were nominally classed as bicycles but performed like unregistered motorcycles.

That changed in late 2025. On 21 November 2025, the Australian Government committed to reinstating e-bike import requirements to meet the European safety and quality standard, EN-15194, and on 19 December 2025 the Federal Government updated import laws to require e-bikes imported into Australia to meet EN 15194 (2017). This update effectively stops the flow of any e-bike over 250W at the border, regardless of individual state laws.

The reinstated standard limits e-bikes to 25 km/h, caps continuous rated power at 250 watts, and includes an anti-tampering requirement. The anti-tampering clause is significant — under the previous, simpler “EPAC” definition there was nothing to stop a high-powered motor being software-locked to 250 W and shipped as a legal bicycle. Queensland authorities have since been explicit that devices with more powerful motors that are “locked” to 250 watts are also prohibited, and federal import rules rely on the hardware rating of the motor.

This is the regulatory bedrock everything below now sits on.

-----

NSW: The National Leader on Product Safety

NSW has moved further and faster than any other jurisdiction on battery and e-mobility product safety, driven by a fire record that Fire and Rescue NSW has documented in painful detail (193 e-micromobility fires between 2022 and 2025, with the rate rising each year, including the state’s first LiB fire fatalities in February 2024).

Product safety regulations

Under the *Gas and Electricity (Consumer Safety) Act 2017*, e-bikes, e-scooters, e-skateboards, self-balancing scooters and the lithium-ion batteries used to power these devices are ‘declared electrical articles’ and must comply with prescribed mandatory safety standards before they can be sold in the state.

The rollout has been staged:

- **1 February 2025** — Stage 1 prescribed safety standards in effect. Devices, batteries and chargers must comply with one of the listed standards (for batteries: EN 50604-1, IEC 62133-2 or UL 2271 for e-bikes; AS/NZS 60335.2.114 for e-scooters/skateboards/hoverboards. For complete bikes/devices: AS/EN 15194 or UL 2849).

- **19 February 2025** — Australia’s first Information Standard for e-micromobility takes effect, requiring point-of-sale safety information.

- **1 August 2025** — Information Standard enforcement begins, with penalties of up to $5,500 for breaching the Information Standard.

- **1 February 2026** — Mandatory testing, certification and marking enforcement, postponed from the original August 2025 date in response to industry feedback. Full enforcement begins, including labeling obligations and legal penalties for non-compliance up to $825,000.

A small but important carve-out: as of 18 December 2025, e-micromobility vehicles used for hire, rent or lease are exempt from the testing, certification and marking requirements, although chargers must already be tested, certified and marked.

Riding rules

Privately owned e-scooters remain illegal on NSW roads, footpaths and shared paths — they can only be ridden on private property, with shared trial schemes the only public-space exception. E-bikes have until recently been the outlier in another way: NSW was the only Australian state to permit a 500 W EPAC class. NSW increased the maximum continuous rated power to 500W (from 250W) in early 2023 to assist riders in hilly areas, e-cargo bikes with loads and those with restricted mobility. However, the increase in power also contributed to loopholes — grey areas in the definition led to a wave of high-powered bikes that behave more like electric motorbikes than pedal-assisted bicycles.

In December 2025 the NSW Government announced this would be unwound. The continuous rated power of e-bikes will be capped at 250 watts, bringing NSW into line with other states. To be used on a road, an e-bike will need to comply with EN 15194 by 1 March 2029. Owners of currently legal e-bikes with maximum power output up to 500 watts must transition to an EN compliant model by that deadline. After 1 March 2029, bikes that do not comply with the EN 15194 standard can be seized under new seizure and crushing laws.

Public transport

From November 2025, converted e-bikes — regular pedal bikes that have been retrofitted with a motor and lithium-ion battery — are banned from Sydney Trains, NSW TrainLink and Metro services. Riders caught with a restricted converted e-bike or its battery on the network face a $400 penalty notice and fines of up to $1,100.

-----

Queensland: Big Reforms in the Pipeline

Queensland’s current rules sit at the more permissive end nationally — e-scooters and PMDs are legal on footpaths, shared paths and local roads — but enforcement and penalties are not light. Police enforce 12 km/h speed limits on footpaths and shared paths with fines of more than $660. The maximum speed anywhere is 25 km/h. Helmet fines exceed $160. Holding a mobile phone while riding attracts fines of more than $1,250. Hit-and-run penalties for non-serious incidents exceed $3,000 and can include imprisonment.

The state’s regulatory direction is changing significantly. After 14 e-mobility-related deaths in 2025 and a parliamentary inquiry that delivered 28 recommendations (all accepted or accepted-in-principle), the *Transport and Other Legislation (Managing E-mobility Use and Protecting Our Communities) Amendment Bill 2026* was introduced in March 2026. Subject to parliamentary approval, the laws are expected to take effect from 1 July, with a six-month transition period.

Key proposed changes:

- 10 km/h speed limit on footpaths and shared paths, replacing the existing 12 km/h limit for PMDs and addressing a regulatory gap where there was no existing speed limit for EPACs.

- PMDs to be permitted on any road with a speed limit of 60 km/h or less, replacing the existing rules that limited PMDs to roads with no dividing line and 50 km/h or less.

- Riders over 16 must hold a valid driver’s licence of any class. Under-16s banned outright from public roads, paths and shared spaces. Parents and guardians can be held liable for fines.

- More powerful devices capable of exceeding 25km/h will be reclassified as motorcycles or mopeds and will require registration and insurance. Police gain powers to randomly breath test riders and seize devices on first offence.

- Fines for unreasonably obstructing footpaths and other areas, with hire operators required to provide local governments or police with information about the last known user.

-----

Victoria: Public Transport Crackdown, Sales Tightening

Victoria’s response has focused most visibly on the public transport network, after several high-profile lithium-ion battery fires aboard trains.

Public transport (Conduct on Public Transport Regulations 2025, in force 21 December 2025)

Converted e-bikes are banned on metropolitan and V/Line trains and within ticketed areas. The penalty is $508.78 for adults or $101.76 for children. E-bikes, e-scooters and other rideable e-devices must be switched off and cannot be ridden or charged on board, on platforms or in station precincts. Only foldable e-scooters and e-bikes are allowed on trams and PTV buses. The changes do not apply to mobility scooters, which continue to be allowed on the network.

Riding and product rules

Victoria does not allow e-scooters on footpaths but permits them on shared paths and bike infrastructure. The 25 km/h cap and 250 W EPAC limit apply. E-bikes with toggle switches that allow the bike to override legal power and wattage limits, an EPAC that continues to provide motorised power above 25 km/h, or any bicycle with a combined maximum continuous rated power output greater than 250 watts cannot be ridden on public roads and road-related areas — these can only be ridden on private property and there are significant fines of over $1,000 if caught riding one in public areas.

Victoria has also passed the *Transport Legislation Amendment (Vehicle Sharing Scheme Safety and Standards) Bill 2025*, establishing a centralised regulatory framework under the Department of Transport and Planning to streamline operations, improve safety, and provide consistency for councils, operators, and users of shared micromobility services. The City of Melbourne has banned shared hire scooters altogether, while Yarra has effectively done so by raising fees by 400%.

-----

South Australia: Newly Legal as of July 2025

SA was a late mover. From 13 July 2025, privately owned electric scooters (e-scooters) and other personal mobility devices can legally be ridden on roads and paths in South Australia.

Key rules: individuals aged 16 and over can ride e-scooters and similar devices on footpaths, bike paths, many bike lanes, and certain roads. No driver’s licence or vehicle registration is required. Riders must wear a helmet and use a flashing light in low light conditions. E-scooter riders are permitted on roads with speed limits up to 60 km/h but must use bike lanes and travel no faster than 25 km/h. On footpaths, beaches and shared paths, e-scooters are limited to 10 km/h. Other personal devices such as e-skateboards and e-solo-wheels can be used on roads with speed limits up to 50 km/h at speeds up to 25 km/h. Fines for serious breaches can reach up to $2,500.

PMDs sold in SA must meet an applicable safety standard — currently the AUS/NZ electrical safety standard. PMDs are not permitted on public transport in SA (trains, trams, buses), although the government has indicated this may change.

-----

Western Australia: e-Rideables Established, Inquiry Recommendations Pending

WA has had a legal framework for “e-Rideables” (e-scooters, e-skateboards, hoverboards, e-unicycles) for some time. The headline rules: 10 km/h on footpaths and pedestrian crossings, 25 km/h on local roads, bicycle paths and shared paths. eRiders are subject to the same drink and drug driving laws as motor vehicle drivers. Breaking electric scooter laws will result in fines depending on the severity of the offence — for example $500–$1,000 for using a mobile phone while riding.

In 2025, an inquiry into e-scooters and e-bikes in WA made a number of recommendations including changes to laws, many of which the state government supported and are planned for implementation. In the meantime, police continue to enforce current rules, including targeting illegal devices and unsafe riding behaviour. WA is the only state with an explicit 16+ minimum age. E-bikes are dealt with separately from e-Rideables and follow standard bicycle rules under the Road Traffic Code 2000.

-----

Tasmania: Permissive but Bounded

Tasmania allows private and shared e-scooters, with 15 km/h on footpaths and 25 km/h elsewhere, a 16+ minimum age (children under 16 are restricted to ≤200 W, ≤10 km/h devices), and a 45 kg device weight ceiling. In Tasmania, e-bikes that have not been modified may be taken on trains only, and e-scooters are not allowed on buses.

-----

ACT: Path-Friendly, Road-Restricted

The ACT has legalised PMDs since 2019. E-scooters are permitted on footpaths, shared paths, bicycle paths and the bicycle side of separated paths. Speed limits are 15 km/h on footpaths, 25 km/h elsewhere. Roads only for the shortest, safest route where there is no footpath, shared path or nature strip available, or it is impracticable to use one. There are no public transport restrictions specific to e-mobility devices.

-----

Northern Territory: Hire-Only, in Trial Areas

The NT remains the most restrictive jurisdiction for private ownership. Riding personal e-scooters remains illegal on roads and road-related areas, including footpaths, shared paths, and bicycle lanes. They can only be used on private property. The NT government encourages the use of hired e-scooters instead. The Darwin trial scheme operates with Beam Mobility / Neuron, capped at 15 km/h. People caught riding private e-scooters in public will be fined for driving an unregistered and uninsured motor vehicle.

E-bikes are legal under standard bicycle rules.

-----

Public Transport: The Quickest-Moving Frontier

Public transport rules have shifted faster than any other category in the past nine months, driven directly by lithium-ion battery fires aboard trains and within station precincts. In Tasmania, e-bikes that have not been modified may be taken on trains only, and e-scooters are not allowed on buses. In Queensland they are not permitted on trams or buses, and in South Australia they are not allowed on any type of public transport. At the time of writing, there were no such limitations in the ACT, the Northern Territory and Western Australia. Both NSW (November 2025) and Victoria (December 2025) have introduced specific bans on converted e-bikes on rail networks, while permitting compliant factory-built e-bikes and foldable e-scooters under varying conditions.

-----

What This Means in Practice

A few patterns emerge from this landscape.

**Convergence on 250 W / 25 km/h.** With the Commonwealth’s December 2025 import rule and NSW’s planned alignment, the entire country will sit on the same EPAC definition by 2029 at the latest. Software-locked higher-powered motors are now explicitly out of bounds.

**Convergence on EN 15194 as the reference standard.** The federal import requirement, combined with NSW’s product safety regulations citing it, makes EN 15194 (and its companion battery standard EN 50604-1) the de facto national specification for e-bikes. AS 15194 is the Australian-adopted equivalent. UL 2849 remains acceptable in some state product safety regimes but does not on its own satisfy the federal road-vehicle import test.

**Enforcement is sharpening at both ends.** At the supply end, NSW’s $825,000 maximum penalty and Federal Border Force import controls target retailers and importers. At the use end, QLD’s draft Bill, NSW’s seizure-and-crush powers, and the WA enforcement focus all push consequences onto riders and parents.

**Fire risk is the dominant policy driver.** The trigger for almost every regulation reviewed here is a documented fire — particularly fires linked to converted e-bikes, retrofit kits and high-capacity replacement batteries used by delivery riders. Product safety regulation is moving faster than rider regulation in part because the failure mode is so visible: a townhouse fatality in NSW in February 2024, repeated train fires through 2024–2025, and the Croydon e-bike shop fire of January 2024.

**The remaining patchwork is in rider rules, not product rules.** What’s legal to *sell* will look very similar across the country by 2027. What’s legal to *ride*, where, by whom, and on what — that will continue to vary, with QLD imposing licence requirements that no other state has yet contemplated, NT remaining hire-only, and the footpath/no-footpath split between NSW–Victoria and the rest persisting into the foreseeable future.

For anyone buying a new e-bike in 2026, the practical advice is now straightforward: look for the EN 15194 mark and an EN 50604-1 battery, and the device will be legal to ride and re-sell anywhere in the country, today and through any reasonable future of policy reform.

-----

Sources

- NSW Government — New safety standards for lithium-ion batteries in e-mobility devices: https://www.nsw.gov.au/housing-and-construction/safety-home/electrical-safety/lithium-ion-battery-safety/new-standards-for-lithium-ion-batteries-e-micromobility-devices

- NSW Government — Nation-leading safety and information standards now in effect (Feb 2025): https://www.nsw.gov.au/ministerial-releases/nation-leading-safety-and-information-standards-for-lithium-ion-battery-products-now-effect

- NSW Government — E-Bike FAQs: https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/bikes-e-bikes-e-scooters/bicycles-electric-bikes/e-bike-faqs

- TÜV Rheinland — New South Wales New Safety Standards summary: https://www.tuv.com/regulations-and-standards/en/new-south-wales-new-safety-standards-for-lithium-ion-batteries-in-e-mobility-devices.html

- SGS — NSW Australia Publishes Mandatory Regulation: https://www.sgs.com/en/news/2024/11/safeguards-16324-nsw-australia-publishes-mandatory-regulation-for-e-mobility-devices-and-batteries

- Queensland StreetSmarts — Rules for riders: https://streetsmarts.initiatives.qld.gov.au/initiatives/pmd-rules/

- Queensland Parliament — Transport and Other Legislation (Managing E-mobility Use) Amendment Bill 2026 Explanatory Notes: https://documents.parliament.qld.gov.au/bills/2026/4284/Transport-and-Other-Legislation-(Managing-E-mobility-Use-and-Protecting-Our-Communities)-Amendment-Bill-2026—Explanatory-Notes-1590.pdf

- Bicycle Network — Queensland moves to license e-scooter and e-bike riders: https://bicyclenetwork.com.au/newsroom/2026/03/25/queensland-moves-to-license-e-scooter-and-e-bike-riders/

- Smith’s Lawyers — Queensland’s E-Mobility Crackdown: https://www.smithslawyers.com.au/post/qld-ebike-crackdown-debate

- National Seniors Australia — Crackdown on e-scooters and e-bikes: https://nationalseniors.com.au/news/featured-news/crackdown-on-e-scooters-and-e-bikes

- Transport Victoria — Electric bikes: https://transport.vic.gov.au/road-and-active-transport/active-transport/bicycles/electric-bikes

- Transport Victoria — Changes to public transport rules (Dec 2025): https://transport.vic.gov.au/news-and-resources/news/changes-to-the-way-you-use-public-transport-and-the-rules-for-travelling-on-board

- Transport Victoria — E-scooter road rules: https://transport.vic.gov.au/road-and-active-transport/active-transport/e-scooter-road-rules

- Parliament of Victoria — Helmet mandates, GPS limits and fines: https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/news/infrastructure/escooter-regulation/

- South Australia DIT — Street legal: e-scooters can be driven on SA roads from July: https://dit.sa.gov.au/news/articles/2025/june/street-legal-e-scooters-can-be-driven-on-sa-roads-from-july

- South Australia My Licence — Personal Mobility Devices: https://mylicence.sa.gov.au/road-rules/personal-mobility-devices

- South Australia Law Handbook — Electric scooters and other PMDs: https://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch12s08s05s11.php

- RAC WA — E-skateboards, e-scooters and e-hoverboards: https://rac.com.au/horizons/drive/e-skateboard-e-scooter-rules

- WA Government — eRideables: https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/road-safety-commission/erideables

- NT Government — Electric scooters and bikes: https://nt.gov.au/driving/safety/electric-scooters-and-bikes

- NRMA — Rules for e-scooters and e-bikes (cross-jurisdictional summary): https://www.mynrma.com.au/open-road/advice-and-how-to/road-safety/rules-for-e-scooters-and-e-bikes

- Bicycle Network — Feds return to Euro e-bike standard: https://bicyclenetwork.com.au/newsroom/2025/12/03/feds-return-to-euro-e-bike-standard/

- Bicycle NSW — Towards safe and legal e-bikes in NSW: https://bicyclensw.org.au/towards-safe-legal-ebikes-nsw/

- Fire and Rescue NSW — LiB Fire Data Jan–Jun 2024 (project file)

Patterns in People

Some people bring calm.
Some bring noise.
Some bring a slow drip of tension that fills the room before anyone says a word.

And the thing is — they bring that every time.
There’s a quote I keep coming back to:

“How you do anything is how you do everything.”

It’s not about perfection. It’s about patterns.

  • One person always scans for failure.

  • Another pushes forward with quiet optimism.

  • One freezes in indecision and peppers you with questions before you can even breathe.

  • Another rolls up their sleeves and makes progress — not noise.

None of this is good or bad on its own. But over time, these habits shape the work. They affect the flow. They become part of the system itself.

And if you’re someone who notices these things — if you feel the friction or the uplift the moment someone enters the room — it can be both a gift and a drain.

Because when the load is heavy and the timeline is tight, you don’t just need skill.
You need people whose default settings don’t make things harder.

The ones who bring presence, not panic.
Clarity, not confusion.
Energy, not drag.

The Sea Will Take You Too: The Hidden Half of the Icarus Myth

What if everything you know about the Icarus story is designed to keep you small?

You know the tale. Daedalus, the master craftsman, fashions wings of feathers and wax for himself and his son Icarus to escape their island prison. As they prepare to fly, he warns Icarus: "Don't fly too close to the sun, or the wax will melt and you'll fall."

Icarus, drunk on the power of flight, ignores the warning. He soars higher and higher until the sun melts his wings and he plummets to his death. The moral, we're told, is clear: don't reach too high, don't get too ambitious, don't let success go to your head.

But there was another warning. One that's been quietly edited out of most retellings.

"Don't fly too low," Daedalus also warned, "or the sea spray will weigh down your feathers and drag you into the waves."

The question isn't why we forgot this warning - it's why we were taught to forget it.

I discovered this firsthand when I was six years old, tasked with colouring a picture of a steam train. While my classmates decorated their locomotives in rainbows of crayon colours, I carefully filled mine in solid black. My father had a model train set at home, and every locomotive was black. I wasn't being creative - I was being accurate.

My teacher made me do it again. "Use more colours," she insisted. "Be creative like the other children."

I learned something that day that had nothing to do with art: accuracy mattered less than conformity. Thinking differently, even when you were right, was wrong.

But my teacher wasn't malicious. She was doing what teachers, parents, and institutions have done for generations: reinforcing a system that works better when people don't test boundaries.

Think about it. Schools need students who colour inside the lines, literally and figuratively. Corporations need employees who don't question established processes. Governments need citizens who trust authority rather than testing it. The "don't fly too high" message isn't just about personal safety - it's about social order.

But here's what they don't tell you: the system needs you to believe you're not capable of more. Because the moment you discover your real boundaries instead of your assumed ones, you become unpredictable. You start asking uncomfortable questions. You might even point out that the emperor isn't wearing clothes.

I started questioning these assumed boundaries on a bicycle, riding through ten hours of constant rain.

Most people's first reaction when I mention this isn't curiosity about technique or preparation - it's disbelief. "You would have melted," they joke, as if rain were acid rather than water. As if humans hadn't been moving through weather for millennia. As if getting wet were dangerous rather than just uncomfortable.

Their incredulity reveals something profound: they've internalized boundaries they've never tested. The distance isn't beyond human capability - people regularly work ten-hour shifts indoors. The rain isn't dangerous - it's just weather. But somewhere along the way, they learned that combining endurance with discomfort was reserved for "special people."

The absurdity becomes clear when even a one-hour bicycle commute in light rain raises eyebrows. "You rode to work in this weather?" they ask, as if I'd swum across an ocean rather than pedalled through water falling from the sky. We've become so removed from basic human capability that normal interaction with weather seems heroic.

Tim Krabbé, the Dutch cycling writer, captured this perfectly: "Velvet pillows, safari parks, sunglasses: people have become woolly mice. They still have bodies that can walk for five days and four nights through a desert of snow, without food, but they accept praise for having taken a one‑hour bicycle ride. 'Good for you.' Instead of expressing their gratitude for the rain by getting wet, people walk around with umbrellas."

Woolly mice. That's what we've become. Celebrating one-hour bike rides while our bodies are capable of walking through snow deserts for days. We've drifted so far from normal human capability that we mistake ordinary endurance for extraordinary achievement.

But there's an antidote to this cultural conditioning.

Something remarkable happens when you gather people who refuse to accept these artificial boundaries. I've been part of a team that set a world record - for the fastest electric vehicle over 1000km on a single charge, and multiple Bridgestone World Solar Challenge projects. These weren't collections of superhuman athletes or engineering geniuses. They were ordinary students who collectively decided to ignore the cultural mythology about what's possible.

The magic wasn't in special abilities - it was in creating environments where persistence became normal instead of celebrated. When everyone on the team expects to work through problems rather than surrender to them, when getting uncomfortable is just part of the process rather than a reason to quit, suddenly "impossible" distances and records become achievable. The teams succeeded because they normalized endurance rather than mythologizing it.

Take the Sunswift Racing team. When individual members might have accepted "that's too ambitious" or "we don't have the resources," the collective culture said "let's figure it out." The world record wasn't achieved through individual heroics but through a team environment where persistence through problems became the default response. Two years ago, they won the Bridgestone World Solar Challenge, and now they're at it again - not because they're different people, but because they've created a culture where extraordinary becomes ordinary.

This is the secret hiding in plain sight: when you change the environment, you change what seems possible. Individual conditioning says "be realistic about your limitations." Team environments that normalize persistence say "limitations are just problems we haven't solved yet." The Sunswift team proves that extraordinary results don't require extraordinary people - they require ordinary people in environments that expect persistence instead of celebrating it.

Because here's what I've learned from ten-hour rides in constant rain, from the world record attempt, from watching teams achieve what others call impossible: achievement is fundamentally an endurance event. It's not about bursts of brilliance or special gifts. It's about the decidedly unglamorous capacity to carry on when things get difficult, to overcome when the weather turns bad, to stay persistent when your body wants to quit and the technical challenges seem overwhelming.

This is why the incomplete Icarus story is so damaging. It's not just that we're afraid to fly too high - it's that we've been taught to quit before we even approach our real limits. We mistake struggle for inadequacy instead of recognizing that struggle is where capability lives. Most people "fly too low" not because they lack ability, but because they've never learned that persistence is a choice, not a talent.

The most liberating truth I can offer you is this: you already possess everything you need. The capability for endurance, for persistence, for carrying on when things get hard - these aren't special gifts bestowed on a chosen few. They're basic human equipment. Your body can handle ten hours of rain. Your mind can work through complex problems over months and years. Your spirit can persist through setbacks that would have seemed insurmountable from a distance.

The problem isn't your capacity - it's the cultural programming that's convinced you to doubt it. From that first steam train colouring exercise to every "be realistic" conversation since, you've been taught that your assumed limitations are your real ones. But they're not. They're just the boundaries you've been conditioned to accept.

So reject the incomplete Icarus story. Don't just avoid flying too high - refuse to fly too low. Trust your capacity for sustained effort over time. Find or create environments that normalize persistence instead of celebrating it. And remember: the sea will take you if you fly too low, but it can't touch you if you choose to stay aloft.

You're already equipped for more than you know. The only question is whether you'll believe it.

What does your book collection say about who you are?

I recently fed my complete library list into AI and asked it to profile the owner. The result was surprisingly accurate - and made me realise how our reading choices create an unconscious autobiography.

Traditional CVs list what I've done. This shows how I think and what drives me to keep learning. It's actually more powerful than a CV for the right role because it shows how your mind works rather than just what boxes you've ticked.

Based on this comprehensive book collection, the owner emerges as a deeply technical yet artistically minded individual with a fascinating blend of practical engineering expertise and creative sensibilities.

Professional Background: This is clearly someone with serious engineering credentials, likely working in electrical engineering with specialisation in battery technology or power systems. The extensive collection of battery and electrical engineering texts—from fundamental electronics to cutting-edge lithium-ion technology—suggests someone who's not just dabbling but working professionally in this field. The presence of technical manuals alongside practical guides indicates someone who bridges theory and real-world application.

Core Passions:

Transportation Enthusiast: The substantial cycling and motorcycle collection reveals someone who doesn't just study efficient transport—they live it. From maintenance manuals to philosophical works like "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance," this person likely commutes by bike or motorcycle daily and finds deep meaning in the mechanics and experience of human-powered and motorised transport.

Serious Photographer: The photography collection is remarkable—from technical manuals to works by masters like Cartier-Bresson, Avedon, and Robert Frank. This isn't casual interest; it's someone who understands photography as both technical craft and artistic expression. They likely shoot professionally or semi-professionally.

Voracious Reader: With 173 literature and general nonfiction titles—the largest category—this person is clearly a serious reader who consumes everything from contemporary fiction to classic literature. The presence of substantial fantasy collections (George R.R. Martin, Robin Hobb) alongside literary works suggests someone who appreciates both escapism and serious prose.

Culinary Technician: The cooking collection suggests someone who approaches food with the same systematic thinking they apply to engineering—molecular gastronomy, fermentation science, and technical cooking methods. They probably cook with precision and experimentation.

Philosophical Engineer: The presence of books on habits, productivity, minimalism, and stoicism alongside technical manuals suggests someone who applies engineering thinking to life optimisation. They're methodical about personal development and efficiency.

Adventure Mindset: The survival and exploration books, combined with cycling and motorcycle interests, point to someone who seeks challenge and self-reliance in outdoor settings.

Character Profile: This person values function over form but appreciates when both align perfectly. They're likely methodical, curious about how things work, and passionate about sustainability and efficiency. The mix of audiobooks and physical books suggests someone who learns while commuting (probably by bike or motorcycle). They're probably Australian, given the local authors and themes. The collection reveals someone who embodies the intersection of engineering precision and creative expression—equally comfortable discussing lithium battery chemistry and the aesthetics of street photography, or explaining motorcycle mechanics while planning their next cycling adventure.

Moustache Xroad Weekend FS Dual EQ review

A bit less poetic than previous ranting and ravings, because this thing ain’t poetry in motion.

 

Opening:

"Without the electrics, this bike is an absolute pig to ride."

That's the truth I kept coming back to, no matter how plush the ride or sleek the display.

A Bicycle First, or Not at All

I hold what some might call a controversial stance: a bicycle should function well as a bicycle, first and foremost. Any electrics added should assist the rider—not cover for poor design. If a bike can't be ridden efficiently under human power alone, then it's not a bicycle in the traditional sense. It's something else.

This bike? Sure, it has pedals. But it demands electric assistance just to feel rideable. Turn off the power and it's like dragging a parachute—not just the 30kg weight, but active resistance to every pedal stroke. Even on flat roads, the bike fights you.

Here's the thing: weight alone isn't the problem. My Rivendell A Homer Hilsen, loaded to the same 30kg for touring, is a fine to ride. That bike flexes with my pedal stroke, planes with the load, actually performs better weighted than empty. I've done 300km Audax rides on it, taken it over gravel and sealed roads for 150km days fully laden. Never once thought of it as a pig.

The Moustache? My legs—legs that have powered through 75+ rides over 200km—can barely get this thing moving unassisted. The frame doesn't work with you; it works against you. It's not built to be pedalled. It's built to be powered.

So let's stop pretending this is a bicycle and judge it for what it really is: an electric vehicle that happens to have pedals. Once I accepted that, everything made more sense. It's essentially a motorcycle where pedal pressure replaces throttle twist - you're requesting power, not creating it. I’m just expecting bicycle physics and getting motorcycle dynamics with a different control interface. The hydraulic brakes aren't overkill—they're essential for controlling 30kg of momentum hurtling down a hill. The suspension isn't excessive—it's compensating for the fact you're not picking lines carefully at human speeds. The integrated everything makes sense when you're commuting.

With power on—specifically in Tour mode or above—this machine transforms completely. That dead weight becomes stable momentum. The rigid frame that punished human effort becomes a rock-solid platform for electric torque. Hills flatten. Headwinds become irrelevant. Load up the panniers and it doesn't even notice.

Handling, Brakes, and Confidence on Mixed Terrain

Let's talk about how it rides with the power on—because that's the only way it makes sense.

First, the brakes: hydraulic discs. I've historically seen them as overkill on a regular bicycle. Rim brakes are fine for most riding. But on a 30kg electric vehicle doing 45km/h downhill with a tailwind? You need hydraulics. One finger on the lever and you can scrub speed without drama. They're quiet, they don't fade, and most importantly, they give you confidence that you can actually stop this beast. No wondering if you've got enough hand strength after two hours of riding. Just squeeze and slow.

The tyres are 66mm wide 650b monsters that grip like they're personally offended by the idea of sliding. You'll run out of nerve before you run out of traction. On sealed roads they rail corners. Off-road they float over the loose stuff.

I found myself trying to ride it like my road bike or Ducati- expecting quick turn-in from subtle inputs. But this thing's geometry is built for stability, not agility. With these wide tyres and what feels like acres of trail, it's stable to the point of stubbornness. You need deliberate bar input to get it turning, but once you've committed, it tracks beautifully.

The suspension surprised me. Front and rear with actual adjustments—sag, rebound, compression damping. My adventure motorcycle has less adjustment. Set it up properly and it's brilliant. Semi-lock it for road work and the floatiness disappears. Open it up for trails, switch to eMTB mode, and suddenly you're monster-trucking over stuff that would have you picking lines carefully on a normal bike.

But the real test came when I loaded the panniers. Most bikes get twitchy with weight on the back. You feel it wagging, following its own line through corners. Not this thing. Add 10kg of crap and it rides exactly the same. That stiff frame that makes it miserable to pedal? Turns out it's perfect for load carrying. No flex, no drama, just point and shoot stability.

Display, Security, and Smarts

The display itself is another tell - proper bicycles don't need dashboards. Your legs and lungs know the effort, your body knows the distance. But here I am checking battery percentage, assist levels, and power output like I'm monitoring engine parameters.

Still, I'll admit the display does its job well. Beyond the basics (speed, distance, time), it shows a live comparison between your power output and what the motor is contributing. That last bit is oddly satisfying — watching your effort scale alongside the machine's, like a quiet co-pilot who actually pulls their weight. It'll even do turn-by-turn navigation if you've loaded a route. Just another reminder this is a vehicle, not a bicycle.

One feature I really appreciate: the display is removable. Take it off and the bike becomes inert. No display, no power. No power, no assist. Which means if you roll up to a café, pop off the display and toss it in your pocket, the worst anyone can do is try to steal a 30kg deadweight. And frankly, if someone does try to ride away on it, you can just fast-walk after them, clip them behind the ear, and say: “Knock it off. Get off my bike, you idiot.”

Simple, elegant deterrence — and one less app-based gimmick to worry about…

…but, of course, there is an app — because there's always an app. You can sync with Strava or Komoot through your phone, customise power delivery, and dig into ride stats later. The ride details can even auto-upload to these ecosystems, taking the whole "open the app and sync" step out of the equation. Which is exactly how it should be — these systems are meant to get out of your way, not become another burden in your day.

Here's where it gets properly infuriating though: want to customise your ride modes beyond the factory presets? That'll be extra. Bosch locks custom modes behind a paywall in their app. You've already dropped serious money on this machine, but if you want to tweak the power delivery curve to match your riding style, time to get the credit card out again. It's like buying a car and having to pay extra to adjust your seat position. The feature is already there in the hardware—they're just holding it hostage.

Assist Modes — From Pig to Turbo

The bike offers multiple assist modes, and I'll be honest about what each one actually means:

  • OFF – No assist. Pure pig mode. I've covered this.

  • ECO – Marginally better than OFF. Like putting lipstick on said pig. The motor adds just enough to remind you it exists, but not enough to make the bike rideable. Skip it.

  • TOUR – This is where the machine wakes up. Push hard and it rewards you with more power than you're putting in. Ease off and it backs off too. That feedback loop actually feels earned—you're still working, but the work makes sense. This is my daily mode.

  • TOUR+ and SPORT – Listed in the manual but missing on my bike.

  • eMTB – The trail weapon. Power delivery smooths out, adapts to terrain changes, and serves up torque without demanding much from your legs. Point it at a hill and it just goes. On dirt, this mode is a heap of fun.

  • TURBO – Maximum assist, minimum effort. Save it for showing off to mates or that one brutal hill on the way home.

There's also Push Assist—a walking-pace mode for moving the bike when you're off it. Handy if you're navigating ramps or tight spaces with the motor off. Remember, this thing is 30kg.

Each mode has its place, but Tour is the sweet spot. It gives back what you put in, just more of it. That's what good assist should do—amplify your effort, not replace it entirely.

Battery, Range & Bosch Ecosystem (Real-World Observations)

This bike runs a dual battery system with 1,125 Wh total capacity. But capacity means nothing—what matters is how far it actually goes.

I tracked every commute: 17km each way, net 100m elevation loss in the morning, gaining it all back in the afternoon. The round trip consistently used between 13% and 20% of battery, but the pattern revealed something interesting.

Morning rides were efficient—dropping elevation with fresh legs, the bike sipped power at around 3% per 10km. But the afternoon return told a different story. Same distance, now climbing that 100m back home with the accumulated fatigue from dealing with a day of managing too many things—consumption jumped to 7% per 10km. That's not just the elevation talking. That's fatigue showing up in the data.

Here's another quirk: starting with a full battery, the round trip might use 13-14%. Do the same commute starting at 60% charge? Now it's pulling 18-20%. Lower voltage means the system works harder for the same result. The range estimator knows this—at 100% it promises 280km, but at 50% remaining it's already backpedalling, showing maybe 120km left. The first half of your battery definitely goes further than the second. Perhaps one day these battery management systems will show us State of Energy instead.

I tested Turbo mode exactly once. 43km, 47% battery gone. That's 11% per 10km, with the range estimate dropping to 91km.

The system charges intelligently—alternating between batteries during use, sequential charging to 80%, then parallel to full. No battery anxiety, no manual switching, it works.

Real-world translation: In Tour mode with my commute profile, expect 150-200km range. Less if you're tired, fighting weather. More if you're fresh and conditions are perfect. The display's range estimate is optimistic when full, pessimistic when depleted, and probably most honest somewhere around 70% charge.

I haven't tested proper range anxiety yet. But I already know any long ride means staying around 20kph average - push past the 25kph assist cutoff and you're dragging that parachute again. Eight hours at forced moderate pace on this thing? I’d rather just cruise on the Rivendell where I can go whatever speed feels right.

Use Case and Integration — A Commuter’s Tank

This isn’t a cyclist’s bike. It’s a commuter’s tool. And to be fair, it’s built for that role. Full fenders, integrated lights, a sturdy rear rack — it’s specced for the real world.

But even practical details can miss the mark. The front guard doesn’t extend low enough to actually protect the frame or the battery from gunk. That’s poor design, especially when the battery is a key visual and structural component. You’re left with road grime splashing up onto what should be a protected zone.

Then there’s the front light. On mine, it was mounted pointing directly through the brake and gear cables — casting a lovely criss-cross of shadows at night. I fixed it, but I shouldn’t have had to.

And let’s talk build. Some screws were over-torqued when I received the bike, including one with a rounded hex socket and another with cross threading. That’s not a minor quibble. On a bike at this price point, you expect better attention to detail.

So yes — it’s a commuter’s tank. Tough, capable, ready to ride rain or shine. But don’t confuse “integrated” with “refined.” Not all the integration has been thought through.

Closing Thoughts

This bike isn’t perfect. It’s heavy, stiff, and completely reliant on its motor to be enjoyable. But it’s also solid, planted, and remarkably capable when used within its intended purpose. With power on and bags loaded, it eats up commutes and weekend gravel rides alike. It doesn’t pretend to be a high-performance machine, and once you stop expecting it to behave like one, it actually makes a lot of sense.

I came into this review expecting to critique a lot — and I have. But I’ve also come to respect what it is.

That’ll do, pig.

Becoming Late

Sometimes, we become who others need us to be.
Quietly. Gradually.
Without malice, without conscious choice.

We shape ourselves to fit the room we were handed.
To avoid conflict. To be easier to love.
To be dependable, useful, unshakeable.

And it works — for a while.

You play the role.
You carry the weight.
You get good at meeting expectations that were never clearly spoken.

And then one day, the question arrives quietly:

Is it too late for me to be me?

Not the version others imagined.
Not the role you’ve played so well.
Just… you. Unperformed. Unedited.

And maybe — just maybe — asking the question is the start.
The moment the projection flickers, and something real begins to form underneath.
Not through rebellion. Just… honesty.

To stop waiting for validation.
To stop bending first.
To stop apologising for taking up space.

It might be late.
But it's still becoming.

Movement and Transition

Movement is not always forward. Sometimes it’s the recognition of stillness that spurs progress. The transition is not just about where we go—it's about how we change along the way.
In The Photographer’s Eye, Steiglitz reminds us that photography captures both time and space, and within that frame, transition is constant.
Yet as Sun Tzu said in The Art of War, ‘The wise warrior avoids battle’—sometimes, in stillness, we make the most significant strides.

Confusion and Clarity

In the blur of the every day, where details stack upon details, it becomes harder to see the whole.
As Berger said, 'The way we see things is affected by what we know or what we believe.'
In confusion, even the most delicate forms can feel like walls. Robert Adams, in Why People Photograph, speaks of the photographer's role in revealing clarity, but perhaps, in this moment, clarity is elusive.
Sometimes seeing less is the key to knowing more.

Barriers and Boundaries.

We often see barriers where there are none, and yet the structures we build—both literal and imagined—keep us confined.
What keeps us from moving forward?
In Another Way of Telling, Berger reminds us that every image is a way of seeing—and perhaps the barriers we see shape how we move through the world. The lines we follow, the objects we ignore—each choice is a step toward the walls we either break or leave untouched.

BMW R65

I gave the old German bike an Italian tune-up in the country, cleaning out the accumulated city km it's been doing.
Taking on a fix up project, so many things need attention. Faulty headlight wiring, bulbs not working, faulty odo, gear lever which is so sloppy it must be missing a bearing, worn and broken plastics.
And I'll learn a thing or two.